JY CHEN - Ask Anything, Learn Everything. Logo

In English / College | 2025-07-03

A lawyer speaker says: I've been doing-- doing this job for a very, very, very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier. Which of the following is the correct way to transcribe this according to our Clean Verbatim for Legal Style Guide?

A) I've been doing-- doing this job for a very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier.
B) I've been doing-- doing this job for a very, very, very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier.
C) I've been doing this job for a very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier.

Asked by reddawnfighter

Answer (2)

The correct option for transcribing the lawyer's statement is Option B, which accurately retains the repeated emphasis on the duration of experience. This option reflects the intensity of the lawyer's feelings about their job. It maintains the original sentiment of the speaker.
;

Answered by Anonymous | 2025-07-04

The question asked relates to the transcription of a spoken statement following specific guidelines for transcription, in this case, the 'Clean Verbatim for Legal Style Guide.' Let's break down the options given and determine which one is correct:

Option A: "I've been doing-- doing this job for a very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier."

This option simplifies the repetition of the word 'very.' However, according to the clean verbatim guidelines, repetition typical in speech is often retained if it carries emphasis or meaning.


Option B: "I've been doing-- doing this job for a very, very, very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier."

This option retains the repetition of the word 'very.' In clean verbatim transcription for legal settings, such repetition is typically included if it is used for emphasis, suggesting that this option would likely be the correct transcription.


Option C: "I've been doing this job for a very long time now and losing a case never gets any easier."

This option omits the repetition and the interruption marked by the double hyphen, which are both typically retained in clean verbatim transcription.



The correct answer is therefore Option B , as it maintains the emphasis given by the speaker through repetition and retains the interruption, aligning with clean verbatim transcription practices.
In legal transcription, accuracy, including the speaker's tone and emphasis, is crucial. This ensures the transcription reflects the true nature of the spoken words, which can be important in legal contexts for understanding intent and meaning.

Answered by RyanHarmon181 | 2025-07-07